[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bond: changed slave_id to uint8_t to prevent data loss

[Maciej Gajdzica]

In some places slave_id is declared as uint16_t, which causes data loss
when using functions expecting port_id as uint8_t. Issue found with
static code analysis tool.

Signed-off-by: Maciej Gajdzica <maciejx.t.gajdzica at intel.com>
---
 lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c 
b/lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
index f1cf81a..97a828e 100644
--- a/lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
+++ b/lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
@@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ bond_mode_8023ad_periodic_cb(void *arg)
        struct ether_addr slave_addr;

        void *pkt = NULL;
-       uint16_t i, slave_id;
+       uint8_t i, slave_id;


        /* Update link status on each port */
@@ -1050,7 +1050,7 @@ int
 bond_mode_8023ad_enable(struct rte_eth_dev *bond_dev)
 {
        struct bond_dev_private *internals = bond_dev->data->dev_private;
-       uint16_t i;
+       uint8_t i;

        for (i = 0; i < internals->active_slave_count; i++)
                bond_mode_8023ad_activate_slave(bond_dev, i);
-- 
1.7.9.5