Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: Suanming Mou <suanmi...@mellanox.com> > Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 7:00 AM > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Raslan Darawsheh <rasl...@mellanox.com> > Subject: [PATCH 0/8] net/mlx5 counter optimize > > In the plan of save the memory consumption for rte_flow, the counter > memory consumption will be optimized from two perspective. > > Change the counter object saving as index instead of pointer in rte_flow. > In this case, since currently the counters are allocated from the pool, > counter can use the index as it is in the pool to address the object. The > counter index ID is made up of the pool index and counter offset in the > pool. > > Split the counter struct members are used only in batch and none batch. > Currently, there are two kinds of counters, one as batch and others as > none batch. The most widely used batch counters only use limited members > in the counter struct. Split the members only used by none batch counters > to the extend counter struct, and allocate the memory only for the none > batch counter pools saves memory for batch counters. > > > Suanming Mou (8): > net/mlx5: fix incorrect counter container usage > net/mlx5: optimize counter release query generation > net/mlx5: change verbs counter allocator to indexed > common/mlx5: add batch counter id offset > net/mlx5: change Direct Verbs counter to indexed > net/mlx5: optimize flow counter handle type > net/mlx5: split the counter struct > net/mlx5: reorganize fallback counter management > > drivers/common/mlx5/mlx5_prm.h | 9 + > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c | 6 +- > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h | 52 +++-- > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c | 28 ++- > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.h | 10 +- > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 445 ++++++++++++++++++-------------- > ----- > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_verbs.c | 173 ++++++++++---- > 7 files changed, 428 insertions(+), 295 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.8.3.1
Series applied to next-net-mlx, Kindest regards, Raslan Darawsheh
