On 4/5/2020 3:49 AM, Xueming Li wrote:
> Introduce new command to dump memory statistics of each socket,
> summary, also show changes since last call.
>
> Usage:
> dump_socket_mem
>
> Signed-off-by: Xueming Li <xuemi...@mellanox.com>
<...>
> @@ -9576,6 +9626,8 @@ static void cmd_dump_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>
> if (!strcmp(res->dump, "dump_physmem"))
> rte_dump_physmem_layout(stdout);
> + else if (!strcmp(res->dump, "dump_socket_mem"))
> + dump_socket_mem(stdout);
> else if (!strcmp(res->dump, "dump_memzone"))
> rte_memzone_dump(stdout);
> else if (!strcmp(res->dump, "dump_malloc")) {
This "dump_malloc" is not in the upstream, which cause a conflict while merging
the patch, which is breaking our automated tests.
It is OK for now, but for later please rebase your patches on latest master.
> @@ -9604,6 +9656,7 @@ static void cmd_dump_parsed(void *parsed_result,
> TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_dump_result, dump,
> "dump_physmem#"
> "dump_memzone#"
> + "dump_socket_mem#"
> "dump_struct_sizes#"
> "dump_ring#"
> "dump_mempool#"
> diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> index 1a9879f..0942ae5 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> @@ -539,6 +539,12 @@ Dumps the layout of all memory zones::
>
> testpmd> dump_memzone
>
> +dump socket
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~
Title fixed as "dump socket memory" while merging
Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
Applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks.
