> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zh...@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 2:46 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>; Peng, Yuan <yuan.p...@intel.com>;
> Lu, Nannan <nannan...@intel.com>; Fu, Qi <qi...@intel.com>; Wang, Haiyue
> <haiyue.w...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org; Zhao1, Wei
> <wei.zh...@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 06/13] net/ice: add action number check for swicth
> 
> The action number can only be one for DCF or PF switch filter, not support
> large action.

There is no "large action" in rte_flow, maybe just "not support multiple 
actions"?

> 
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> Fixes: 47d460d63233 ("net/ice: rework switch filter")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zh...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c
> b/drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c
> index d9bdf9637..cc48f22dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c
> @@ -1073,6 +1073,46 @@ ice_switch_parse_action(struct ice_pf *pf,
>       return -rte_errno;
>  }
> 
> +static int
> +ice_switch_check_action(const struct rte_flow_action *actions,
> +                         struct rte_flow_error *error)
> +{
> +     const struct rte_flow_action *action;
> +     enum rte_flow_action_type action_type;
> +     uint16_t actions_num = 0;
> +
> +     for (action = actions; action->type !=
> +                             RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END; action++) {
> +             action_type = action->type;
> +             switch (action_type) {
> +             case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_VF:
> +             case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_RSS:
> +             case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_QUEUE:
> +             case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_DROP:
> +                     actions_num++;
> +                     break;
> +             case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_VOID:
> +                     continue;
> +             default:
> +                     rte_flow_error_set(error,
> +                                        EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> +                                        actions,
> +                                        "Invalid action type");
> +                     return -rte_errno;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +     if (actions_num > 1) {
> +             rte_flow_error_set(error,
> +                                EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> +                                actions,
> +                                "Invalid action number");
> +             return -rte_errno;
> +     }
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  ice_switch_parse_pattern_action(struct ice_adapter *ad,
>               struct ice_pattern_match_item *array, @@ -1158,6 +1198,14 @@
> ice_switch_parse_pattern_action(struct ice_adapter *ad,
>               goto error;
>       }
> 
> +     ret = ice_switch_check_action(actions, error);
> +     if (ret) {
> +             rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> +                                RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_HANDLE, NULL,
> +                                "Invalid input action number");
> +             goto error;
> +     }
> +
>       if (ad->hw.dcf_enabled)
>               ret = ice_switch_parse_dcf_action(actions, error, &rule_info);
>       else
> --
> 2.19.1

Reply via email to