Hi
From: Benoit Ganne (bganne)
> > Why link speed is undefined?
> > Old kernel?
> > Kernel mlx5 driver issue?
> > Do you know?
>
> Seems to be a bug in kernel mlx5 driver:
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmails.
> dpdk.org%2Farchives%2Fusers%2F2020-
> March%2F004758.html&data=02%7C01%7Cmatan%40mellanox.com%7C
> 69ce3bfd96484267869908d7d4b1ca89%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f46
> 1b%7C0%7C0%7C637211732388079395&sdata=%2BnfjST6fM4zoIYwJz7L
> Z2zL3rGmmOFXbpW0fK7Weps4%3D&reserved=0
> I still think this test is too strict, and from what I can see mlx4 PMD do not
> implement it (even if it uses 2 syscalls too).
Yes, Doesn't mean this is not a bug in mlx4😊
Thanks Ben.
So we have 2 orthogonal efforts here:
1. To check with our driver team what is the issue to report a VF link speed :
For me 😊
2. To change documentation of ethdev API to say that only link status is
mandatory report. (all others "nice to have" or "best effort"):
This is for you - I suggest to send prior patch to ethdev for this and
let the community to decide.
Are you agree?
> ben
