The command line to create RTE flow for specific proto_id of PPPOES is
not correct. This patch is to fix this issue.
Fixes: 226c6e60c35b ("ethdev: add PPPoE to flow API")
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Xiao Zhang <xiao.zh...@intel.com>
---
app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c | 13 +++----------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
index a78154502..c25a2598d 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
@@ -768,7 +768,6 @@ static const enum index next_item[] = {
ITEM_GTP_PSC,
ITEM_PPPOES,
ITEM_PPPOED,
- ITEM_PPPOE_PROTO_ID,
ITEM_HIGIG2,
ITEM_TAG,
ITEM_L2TPV3OIP,
@@ -1030,11 +1029,6 @@ static const enum index item_pppoed[] = {
static const enum index item_pppoes[] = {
ITEM_PPPOE_SEID,
- ITEM_NEXT,
- ZERO,
-};
-
-static const enum index item_pppoe_proto_id[] = {
ITEM_PPPOE_PROTO_ID,
ITEM_NEXT,
ZERO,
@@ -2643,10 +2637,9 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
[ITEM_PPPOE_PROTO_ID] = {
.name = "proto_id",
.help = "match PPPoE session protocol identifier",
- .priv = PRIV_ITEM(PPPOE_PROTO_ID,
- sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_pppoe_proto_id)),
- .next = NEXT(item_pppoe_proto_id),
- .call = parse_vc,
+ .next = NEXT(item_pppoes, NEXT_ENTRY(UNSIGNED), item_param),
+ .args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY_HTON
+ (struct rte_flow_item_pppoe_proto_id, proto_id)),
},
[ITEM_HIGIG2] = {
.name = "higig2",
--
2.17.1
