On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 13:41:56 +0800 Simei Su <simei...@intel.com> wrote:
> [PATCH 1/5] support FDIR common patterns and actions. > [PATCH 2/5] support FDIR GTPU pattern. > [PATCH 3/5] support FDIR L2TPv3, ESP, AH and NAT-T pattern. > [PATCH 4/5] support FDIR PFCP node and session pattern. > [PATCH 5/5] support FDIR mark action. > > This patchset depend on the following patches on patchwork: > (1)https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/66764/ > [1/2] net/iavf: support generic flow > (2)https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/66765/ > [2/2] net/iavf: support more patterns > (3)https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/66682/ > [07/12] net/iavf: add flow director enabled switch value > (4)https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/66683/ > [08/12] net/iavf: support flow mark in normal data path > (5)https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/66684/ > [09/12] net/iavf: support flow mark in AVX path > (6)https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/66685/ > [10/12] net/iavf: support flow mark in SSE path > > Simei Su (5): > net/iavf: add support for FDIR basic rule > net/iavf: add support for FDIR GTPU > net/iavf: add support for FDIR L2TPv3 and IPSec > net/iavf: add support for FDIR PFCP > net/iavf: add support for FDIR mark action > > drivers/net/iavf/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/net/iavf/iavf.h | 17 + > drivers/net/iavf/iavf_fdir.c | 999 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/net/iavf/iavf_vchnl.c | 128 +++++- > drivers/net/iavf/meson.build | 1 + > 5 files changed, 1145 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/net/iavf/iavf_fdir.c > So Chenxu (from Intel) is removing fdir support and Simei (from Intel) is adding fdir support??
