On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:03 PM Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> wrote: > > 28/01/2020 21:53, Aaron Conole: > > Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> writes: > > > > > Timeout multiplier was 3, which gives 30 seconds for unit test but still > > > some unit test was timing out time to time and travis reporting false > > > positive failures. > > > > > > Increasing the multiplier to 10, which makes timeout duration > > > 100seconds. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> > > > --- > > > > It's okay to me. I thought there was an effort to split out performance > > part of this test from the functional part, but that seems to not have > > gone anywhere. > > > > Acked-by: Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com> > > NACK > The fix should be to split perf tests out of fast-tests. > > The following patch is splitting hash_readwrite_autotest: > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/58726/ > But we are still waiting for a patch splitting hash_readwrite_lf_autotest. > Please consider working on unit tests as a HIGH PRIORITY (using uppercase ;). > We should not have to wait so long to see performance tests removed > from fast unit tests (while keeping the functional coverage).
Just applied series https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=8401&state=*. So marking this patch as rejected. Thanks. -- David Marchand