Hi Ferruh,
PSB,
Thanks,
Ori
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2020 1:08 PM
> To: Ori Kam <or...@mellanox.com>; Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo...@intel.com>;
> Jingjing Wu <jingjing...@intel.com>; Bernard Iremonger
> <bernard.iremon...@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Slava Ovsiienko <viachesl...@mellanox.com>;
> sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix uninitialized members of mpls
>
> On 1/30/2020 4:59 PM, Ori Kam wrote:
> > Some of the memebers of the mpls struct are not initialized.
> > this commit init the uninitialized members.
> >
> > Coverity issue: 325735
> > Fixes: 3e77031be855 ("app/testpmd: add MPLSoGRE encapsulation")
> > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ori Kam <or...@mellanox.com>
> > ---
> > app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > index e99e24c..c2cc4c5 100644
> > --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > @@ -4576,7 +4576,9 @@ static int comp_set_raw_index(struct context *,
> const struct token *,
> > struct rte_flow_item_gre gre = {
> > .protocol = rte_cpu_to_be_16(ETHER_TYPE_MPLS_UNICAST),
> > };
> > - struct rte_flow_item_mpls mpls;
> > + struct rte_flow_item_mpls mpls = {
> > + .ttl = 0,
> > + };
>
> why not use "= {0};", the end result will be same, struct will be all zeroed
> out
> in both case, "= {0};" makes the intention more obvious I think.
>
On some compilers this kind of initialization result in an error:
error: missing braces around initializer
it looks like a known issue of GCC
So I just prefer to init the relevant fields.
> > uint8_t *header;
> > int ret;
> >
> >
