Hi Ferruh,
> <snip>
>
> > >> Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix hotplug
> > >>
> > > This is reverting the original patch, which breaks hotplug.
> > > I think the commit message should make this clear.
> > > This patch is not fixing hotplug, the original patch seems to have
> > > revealed a
> > problem with hotplug.
> > > Reverting this patch will not fix the underlying hotplug issue.
> >
> > What is the problem revealed by the original patch? Did you able to
> > reproduce it?
>
> No, I thought you had.
> There is a lot of information in the commit message, but is not clear that you
> are reverting a patch.
> I am ok with reverting the original patch as it has caused a problem.
Just had another look at the patch, there are two changes.
One reverts the original patch.
The second is a fix.
Suggest splitting patch into two, one for revert and second one for fix.
>
> >
> > >
> > >> The 'port_id_is_invalid()' check in the 'detach_port_device()' is
> > >> breaking the hotplug support, since at that stage port will be
> > >> closed and validity check always fail [1] and removing the device
> > >> is not really
> > completed.
> > >>
> > >> But this cause the vfio request interrupt keep triggered
> > >> continuously and makes the application unusable, since port is
> > >> closed but device is not removed, the remove path keep generating
> error log:
> > >>
> > >> EAL: can not get port by device 0000:00:05.0!
> > >> EAL: can not get port by device 0000:00:05.0!
> > >> EAL: can not get port by device 0000:00:05.0!
> > >> EAL: can not get port by device 0000:00:05.0!
> > >> EAL: can not get port by device 0000:00:05.0!
> > >> EAL: can not get port by device 0000:00:05.0!
> > >>
> > >> Fixed by removing 'port_id_is_invalid()' check from
> > >> 'detach_port_device()', anyway it shouldn't be required. Without
> > >> this check device remove works as expected.
> > >>
> > >> Only "Invalid port_id=0" logs seen a few times, which is because
> > >> the actual removal not done synchronously but an alarm set for it,
> > >> until the alarm fired application may receive many interrupts,
> > >> expect the first ones cause the error.
> > >> So this patch also removes the logging from checking the invalid
> > >> port in 'rmv_port_callback()' to reduce the noise.
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >> rmv_port_callback()
> > >> stop_port(port_id);
> > >> close_port(port_id);
> > >> detach_port_device(port_id);
> > >>
> > >> Fixes: 43d0e304980a ("app/testpmd: fix invalid port detaching")
> > >> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
> > >> ---
> > >> app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 6 ++----
> > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c index
> > >> f9f4cd1d3..3323013bb 100644
> > >> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> > >> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> > >> @@ -2641,9 +2641,6 @@ detach_port_device(portid_t port_id)
> > >>
> > >> printf("Removing a device...\n");
> > >>
> > >> -if (port_id_is_invalid(port_id, ENABLED_WARN)) -return;
> > >> -
> > >> dev = rte_eth_devices[port_id].device; if (dev == NULL) {
> > >> printf("Device already removed\n"); @@ -2875,7 +2872,8 @@
> > >> rmv_port_callback(void *arg) int org_no_link_check =
> > >> no_link_check; portid_t port_id = (intptr_t)arg;
> > >>
> > >> -RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_RET(port_id);
> > >> +if (!rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port(port_id))
> > >> +return;
> > >>
> > >> if (!test_done && port_is_forwarding(port_id)) { need_to_start =
> > >> 1;
> > >> --
> > >> 2.24.1
> > >
> > > Otherwise
> > > Acked-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremon...@intel.com>
> > >
Regards,
Bernard.
