On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 3:05 PM Xiaojun Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is not a generic i2c bus, but rather an indirect access to i2c devices 
> through FM10k registers. It's only purpose is to support the fm10k chip. Also 
> there's currently no i2c bus support framework in DPDK.

To understand it better:

# Who are the i2c master and i2c slave here?
# Is i2c slave connected on board or in-built to FM10K SoC?
# What is the purpose of the i2c API in the ethdev driver?



>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 11:48 PM
> To: Xiaojun Liu
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/7] net/fm10k: add i2c sbus registers 
> definition
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 3:22 PM Xiaojun Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > To support switch management, add the following files:
> > Add fm10k/switch/fm10k_debug.h(define log Macros).
> > Add fm10k/switch/fm10k_regs.h(define all the registers).
> > Add fm10k/switch/fm10k_switch.h(define switch Macros and APIs).
> > Add fm10k/switch/fm10k_i2c.h(define I2C interfaces).
> > Add fm10k/switch/fm10k_i2c.c(support I2C access).
> > Add fm10k/switch/fm10k_sbus.h(define SBUS interface).
> > Add fm10k/switch/fm10k_sbus.c(support SBUS access).
> > and modify fm10k/Makefile(add ENABLE_FM10K_MANAGEMENT support,
> > add fm10k_i2c.c and fm10k_sbus.c).
>
> Integrating NIC with the integrated or onboard switches over i2c or
> sbus is a common problem.
> Instead of polluting ethdev driver with i2c and sbus _bus_ code, Why
> not add new i2c bus
> and move this code to driver/bus/i2c/xxxx/
>
> >
> > To avoid configuration for both kernel driver
> > and userspace SDK outside DPDK, we add switch
> > management in FM10K DPDK PMD driver.
> > To enable switch management, you need add
> > CONFIG_RTE_FM10K_MANAGEMENT=y in
> > config/common_linux when building.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiaojun Liu <[email protected]>

Reply via email to