> -----Original Message----- > From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjac...@gmail.com>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 3:29 PM Ananyev, Konstantin > <konstantin.anan...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Hemant Agrawal > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 5:30 AM > > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > > Cc: Jun Yang <jun.y...@nxp.com> > > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: support unequal number of > > > RXQ and TXQ > > > > > > From: Jun Yang <jun.y...@nxp.com> > > > > > > The existing forwarding mode usages the total number of queues as > > > the minimum of rxq and txq. > > > It finds the txq as the same index as rxq. > > > However in some scenarios, specially for flow control the number of > > > rxq and txq can be different. > > > This patch maxes the txq and function of rxq for all such scenario > > > instead of keeping 1:1 relationship between the two. > > > > > > Now packets from all RXQs can be forwarded to TXQs > > Allow this feature only for DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE devices. > Please probe DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE() capability first to avoid > breaking contract on the other devices. [Hemant] Agree with the suggestion. > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jun Yang <jun.y...@nxp.com> > > > --- > > > app/test-pmd/config.c | 4 +--- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c index > > > d59968278..efa409453 100644 > > > --- a/app/test-pmd/config.c > > > +++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c > > > @@ -2130,8 +2130,6 @@ rss_fwd_config_setup(void) > > > streamid_t sm_id; > > > > > > nb_q = nb_rxq; > > > - if (nb_q > nb_txq) > > > - nb_q = nb_txq; > > > cur_fwd_config.nb_fwd_lcores = (lcoreid_t) nb_fwd_lcores; > > > cur_fwd_config.nb_fwd_ports = nb_fwd_ports; > > > cur_fwd_config.nb_fwd_streams = @@ -2154,7 +2152,7 @@ > > > rss_fwd_config_setup(void) > > > fs->rx_port = fwd_ports_ids[rxp]; > > > fs->rx_queue = rxq; > > > fs->tx_port = fwd_ports_ids[txp]; > > > - fs->tx_queue = rxq; > > > + fs->tx_queue = (rxq % nb_txq); > > > > But does it mean that now 2 lcores cah use the same TX queue? > > If so, then how it supposed to work? > > See above. > > > > > > > fs->peer_addr = fs->tx_port; > > > fs->retry_enabled = retry_enabled; > > > rxp++; > > > -- > > > 2.17.1 > >
