> -----Original Message----- > From: Bie, Tiwei <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, December 6, 2019 12:28 PM > To: Matan Azrad <[email protected]> > Cc: Wang, Xiao W <[email protected]>; Thomas Monjalon > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Wang, Zhihong > <[email protected]>; Yigit, Ferruh <[email protected]>; Shahaf > Shuler > <[email protected]>; Ori Kam <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Slava > Ovsiienko <[email protected]>; Asaf Penso <[email protected]>; Olga > Shern <[email protected]>; Liang, Cunming <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: discussion: creating a new class for vdpa > [email protected] > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 01:26:36PM +0000, Matan Azrad wrote: > > Hi all > > > > As described in RFC “[RFC] net: new vdpa PMD for Mellanox devices”, a > > new vdpa drivers is going to be added for Mellanox devices – mlx5_vdpa > > > > The only vdpa driver now is the IFC driver that is located in net directory. > > > > The IFC driver and the new mlx5_vdpa driver provide the vdpa ops and > > not the eth_dev ops. > > > > All the others drivers in net provide the eth-dev ops. > > > > I suggest to create a new class for vdpa drivers, to move IFC to this > > class and to add the mlx5_vdpa to this class too. > > > > Later, all the new drivers that implements the vdpa ops will be added > > to the vdpa class. > > +1. Sounds like a good idea to me. +1
> > Thanks, > Tiwei > > > > > Will be nice to see your comments. > > > > Matan > >
