Hi Jerin,

I have created a patch to MUSDK that fix this conflicts as you suggested.
This will be externally available in the next MUSDK release.
Once it will be out, we can simplify the armada-config, but until then if 
anyone want to build DPDK with MUSDK it either needs this patch or compile 
MUSDK as shared lib

Regards,
Liron

-----Original Message-----
From: Liron Himi 
Sent: Monday, 2 December 2019 08:32
To: Jerin Jacob <jerinjac...@gmail.com>
Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jer...@marvell.com>; dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>; 
dpdk stable <sta...@dpdk.org>; Liron Himi <lir...@marvell.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] config: update Marvell ARMADA



Regards,
Liron

-----Original Message-----
From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjac...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, 2 December 2019 06:12
To: Liron Himi <lir...@marvell.com>
Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jer...@marvell.com>; dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>; 
dpdk stable <sta...@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] config: update Marvell ARMADA

>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 3:55 PM <lir...@marvell.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Liron Himi <lir...@marvell.com>
> >
> > disable more NXP modules that conflict with MUSDK
>
> # Please share more details on the conflict.
> [L.H.] both components calls of_<x> APIs so when MUSDK is compiled statically 
> it conflicts with NXP's code.

If something implemented in the library, IMO, it should start with the library 
name to avoid namespace collision.
Are we implementing of_x calls in MUSDK? 
[L.H.] yes. It is not the same implementation as in dpaa_of.c Could you share 
the error logs?
[L.H.] 
/home/userlab/work/combined_git/dataplane/musdk/usr/local/lib/libmusdk.a(libmusdk_la-of.o):
 In function `of_n_addr_cells':
/home/userlab/work/combined_git/dataplane/musdk/src/env/of.c:348: multiple 
definition of `of_n_addr_cells'
/home/userlab/work/combined_git/dataplane/dpdk-19.11/build/lib/librte_common_dpaax.a(dpaa_of.o):dpaa_of.c:(.text+0x13b8):
 first defined here

> Note that the original armada config already had some NXP flags disabled, but 
> in recent version NXP moved the of_<x> code to be depends on 
> 'CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_COMMON_DPAAX' so needed to update it.

OK

> # What about meson build? "make" will be deprecated soon.
> [L.H.] only when compiling the MUSDK as static LIBs, we face this issue. In 
> meson we need to compile MUSDK as shared LIBS.

But nothing stopping us to compile MUSDK as static build with meson. Right?
[L.H.] right, but currently it will not work AFAIK there is no way to exclude 
modules from meson builds per configuration file (as we have with 'make' flow), 
right?

> # This scheme won't work for distro build, Please spend the effort to analyze 
> the conflict and fix the conflict. IMO, That would be the correct solution.
>
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liron Himi <lir...@marvell.com>
> > ---
> >  config/defconfig_arm64-armada-linuxapp-gcc | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/config/defconfig_arm64-armada-linuxapp-gcc
> > b/config/defconfig_arm64-armada-linuxapp-gcc
> > index 059180284..c09751cf0 100644
> > --- a/config/defconfig_arm64-armada-linuxapp-gcc
> > +++ b/config/defconfig_arm64-armada-linuxapp-gcc
> > @@ -19,6 +19,23 @@ CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_MVSAM_CRYPTO=y
> >
> >  # Disable NXP as it is conflict with MUSDK 
> > CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_DPAA_BUS=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_COMMON_DPAAX=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_FSLMC_BUS=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_DPAA2_MEMPOOL=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_DPAA2_PMD=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_DPAA_BUS=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_DPAA_MEMPOOL=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_DPAA_PMD=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_DPAA_EVENTDEV=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_DPAA_SEC=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_CAAM_JR=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_DPAA2_EVENTDEV=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_DPAA2_SEC=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_DPAA2_CMDIF_RAWDEV=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_DPAA2_QDMA_RAWDEV=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PFE_PMD=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ENETC_PMD=n
> > +
> >
> >  # Doesn't support NUMA
> >  CONFIG_RTE_EAL_NUMA_AWARE_HUGEPAGES=n
> > --
> > 2.23.0
> >

Reply via email to