https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361
Bug ID: 361 Summary: device reset handling with igb_uio Product: DPDK Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: ethdev Assignee: dev@dpdk.org Reporter: santosh.rasta...@broadcom.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 73 --> https://bugs.dpdk.org/attachment.cgi?id=73&action=edit msi-x vector allocation for igb_uio after device reset Hi, I have a question on igb_uio. >From the below function call traces, vfio-pci module frees/allocates msi-x vector table as part of interrupt disable/enable. Where as igb-uio module, only masks/unmasks the msi-x interrupt. Does this mean, when using igb_uio, device can't undergo reset which clears MSI-X vector table? How to handle device reset with igb_uio? igb-uio: rte_intr_disable->uio_intr_disable->igbuio_pci_irqcontrol->pci_msi_mask_irq rte_intr_enable->uio_intr_enable->igbuio_pci_irqcontrol->pci_msi_unmask_irq igbuio_pci_open->igbuio_pci_enable_interrupts->pci_alloc_irq_vectors/request_irq igbuio_pci_release->igbuio_pci_disable_interrupts->free_irq->pci_free_irq_vectors vfio-pci: rte_intr_disable->vfio_disable_msix->vfio_pci_ioctl->vfio_msi_disable->pci_free_irq_vectors rte_intr_enable->vfio_enable_msix->vfio_pci_ioctl->vfio_msi_enable->pci_alloc_irq_vectors/vfio_msi_set_vector_signal->request_irq I am using the attached hack to overcome this. What is the correct way to handle this? This is a hack as I am assigning "udev->info.irq = -1" when interrupt is disabled to prevent uio_write from exiting. kernel/linux/igb_uio/igb_uio.c: igbuio_pci_irqcontrol igbuio_pci_disable_interrupts(udev); udev->info.irq = -1; <-- Assigning to -1 and not 0. Basically uio_write will not call igbuio_pci_enable_interrupts to enable the interrupts back if irq is 0. drivers/uio/uio.c: uio_write if (!idev->info->irq) { retval = -EIO; goto out; } if (!idev->info->irqcontrol) { retval = -ENOSYS; goto out; } retval = idev->info->irqcontrol(idev->info, irq_on); Regards -Santosh -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.