On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 6:23 AM <pbhagavat...@marvell.com> wrote:
>
> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavat...@marvell.com>
>
> Increase the number of routes from 8 to 16 that are statically added for
> lpm and em mode as most of the SoCs support more than 8 interfaces.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavat...@marvell.com>
> ---
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c | 16 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
> index 74a7c8fa4..c07a5b937 100644
> --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,18 @@ static struct ipv4_l3fwd_em_route
> ipv4_l3fwd_em_route_array[] = {
> {{RTE_IPV4(201, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 20, 0, 1), 102, 12,
> IPPROTO_TCP}, 1},
> {{RTE_IPV4(111, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11,
> IPPROTO_TCP}, 2},
> {{RTE_IPV4(211, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12,
> IPPROTO_TCP}, 3},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(121, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 10, 0, 1), 101, 11,
> IPPROTO_TCP}, 4},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(221, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 20, 0, 1), 102, 12,
> IPPROTO_TCP}, 5},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(131, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11,
> IPPROTO_TCP}, 6},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(231, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12,
> IPPROTO_TCP}, 7},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(141, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11,
> IPPROTO_TCP}, 8},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(241, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12,
> IPPROTO_TCP}, 9},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(151, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11,
> IPPROTO_TCP}, 10},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(251, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12,
> IPPROTO_TCP}, 11},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(161, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11,
> IPPROTO_TCP}, 12},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(261, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12,
> IPPROTO_TCP}, 13},
Am I reading this correctly ? 261.0.0.0 ?
--
David Marchand
