Hi Ferruh, Could you please review v12.
Regards, A Vamsi > -----Original Message----- > From: Vamsi Krishna Attunuru > Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2019 4:39 PM > To: Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <[email protected]>; Kiran > Kumar Kokkilagadda <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 0/2] add IOVA=VA mode support > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2019 4:19 PM > > To: Vamsi Krishna Attunuru <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected]; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <[email protected]>; > > Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda <[email protected]>; > > [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected] > > Subject: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 0/2] add IOVA=VA mode support > > > > External Email > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For info, the mempool patches are merged now. > > > > 05/11/2019 12:04, [email protected]: > > > Vamsi Attunuru (2): > > > kni: add IOVA=VA mode support > > > kni: add IOVA=VA support in kernel module > > > > Should the kernel support be the first patch? > > But required variable `iova_mode` is defined in first patch currently. > Either one is fine to me. Please let me know if want to put kernel support > patch > at first, I will send next version accordingly. > > > > > About the titles, can it be simply "support IOVA mode"? > > Yes, "support IOVA_VA mode" should be fine. > >
