Hi Ferruh, Could you please review v12.
Regards, A Vamsi > -----Original Message----- > From: Vamsi Krishna Attunuru > Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2019 4:39 PM > To: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jer...@marvell.com>; Kiran > Kumar Kokkilagadda <kirankum...@marvell.com>; olivier.m...@6wind.com; > ferruh.yi...@intel.com; anatoly.bura...@intel.com; > arybche...@solarflare.com; step...@networkplumber.org > Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 0/2] add IOVA=VA mode support > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2019 4:19 PM > > To: Vamsi Krishna Attunuru <vattun...@marvell.com> > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jer...@marvell.com>; > > Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda <kirankum...@marvell.com>; > > olivier.m...@6wind.com; ferruh.yi...@intel.com; > > anatoly.bura...@intel.com; arybche...@solarflare.com; > > step...@networkplumber.org > > Subject: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 0/2] add IOVA=VA mode support > > > > External Email > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For info, the mempool patches are merged now. > > > > 05/11/2019 12:04, vattun...@marvell.com: > > > Vamsi Attunuru (2): > > > kni: add IOVA=VA mode support > > > kni: add IOVA=VA support in kernel module > > > > Should the kernel support be the first patch? > > But required variable `iova_mode` is defined in first patch currently. > Either one is fine to me. Please let me know if want to put kernel support > patch > at first, I will send next version accordingly. > > > > > About the titles, can it be simply "support IOVA mode"? > > Yes, "support IOVA_VA mode" should be fine. > >
