On 04-Nov-19 6:32 AM, Wangyu (Turing Solution Development Dep) wrote:

Resolve address conflicts on 64K pagesize without base_virtaddr, which cause 
new address conflicts in eal_get_virtual_area().

Signed-off-by: Beard-627 <dengxiaof...@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Eric wang <seven.wan...@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Wei Hu <xavier.hu...@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Min Hu <humi...@huawei.com>
---
  lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal.c b/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal.c 
index 946222c..c15d406 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal.c
@@ -360,6 +360,28 @@ enum rte_iova_mode
                return -1;
        }
+ if ((getpagesize() == RTE_PGSIZE_64K) &&
+               (internal_config.base_virtaddr == 0)) {
+
+               munmap(rte_mem_cfg_addr, sizeof(*rte_config.mem_config));
+               rte_mem_cfg_addr = (void *)RTE_PTR_ALIGN_CEIL(
+                       (uintptr_t)rte_mem_cfg_addr, (size_t)RTE_PGSIZE_16M);
+               rte_mem_cfg_addr = (void *)RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(
+                       (uintptr_t)rte_mem_cfg_addr -
+                       sizeof(*rte_config.mem_config), sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE));

Please use RTE_PTR_ADD and RTE_PTR_DIFF to perform pointer arithmetic.

+
+               rte_mem_cfg_addr = mmap(rte_mem_cfg_addr,
+                       sizeof(*rte_config.mem_config),
+                       PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, mem_cfg_fd, 0);
+
+               if (rte_mem_cfg_addr == MAP_FAILED) {
+                       close(mem_cfg_fd);
+                       mem_cfg_fd = -1;
+                       RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Cannot mmap memory for 
rte_config\n");
+                       return -1;
+               }
+       }
+
        memcpy(rte_mem_cfg_addr, &early_mem_config, sizeof(early_mem_config));
        rte_config.mem_config = rte_mem_cfg_addr;
--
1.8.3.1


The patch requires a bit more explanation - what exactly is the problem, and why the solution is as above? Also, did you test it on the latest master, since the eal_get_virtal_area() patches [1] got merged?

[1] http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=7043&state=*

--
Thanks,
Anatoly

Reply via email to