Jasvinder,

Thanks! Got confused by outdated documentation that still references old 
design...

Glenn

Sent from iPad
________________________________
From: Singh, Jasvinder <jasvinder.si...@intel.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 1:45 PM
To: Gladchun, Glenn; dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Dumitrescu, Cristian; Yigit, Ferruh
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] DPDK QoS scheduler changes, are we there yet?

***WARNING! THIS EMAIL ORIGINATES FROM OUTSIDE ST ENGINEERING IDIRECT.***

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 3:14 PM
> To: Gladchun, Glenn <ggladc...@idirect.net>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Singh, Jasvinder <jasvinder.si...@intel.com>; Dumitrescu, Cristian
> <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK QoS scheduler changes, are we there yet?
>
> On 10/30/2019 6:35 PM, Gladchun, Glenn wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I stumbled upon this 11 month old post 
> > (https://narkive.com/ZwBXg4Xe<https://narkive.com/ZwBXg4Xe>)
> that goes over future enhancements to the scheduler. All of them are vital,
> and I am especially interested in 16 TCs per pipeā€¦ Christian and/or Jasvinder,
> is the future here yet in some tangible shape or form?
>
> cc'ed Jasvinder & Cristian.
>
> >

Hi Glenn,

The DPDK sched library has been modified to increase the number of traffic 
classes per pipe, please refer source code available on dpdk master to see the 
changes.

Thanks,
Jasvinder

This electronic message and any files transmitted with it contains information 
from iDirect, which may be privileged, proprietary and/or confidential. It is 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed. 
If you are not the original recipient or the person responsible for delivering 
the email to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this 
email in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or 
copying of 
this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please 
delete it and immediately notify the sender.

Reply via email to