> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Viacheslav Ovsiienko
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 3:05 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Matan Azrad <ma...@mellanox.com>; Raslan Darawsheh
> <rasl...@mellanox.com>; Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>;
> olivier.m...@6wind.com; arybche...@solarflare.com; Ori Kam
> <or...@mellanox.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/2] ethdev: move egress metadata to dynamic
> field
> 
> The dynamic mbuf fields were introduced by [1]. The egress metadata is
> good candidate to be moved from statically allocated field tx_metadata to
> dynamic one. Because mbufs are used in half-duplex fashion only, it is
> safe to share this dynamic field with ingress metadata.
> 
> The shared dynamic field contains either egress (if application going to
> transmit mbuf with tx_burst) or ingress (if mbuf is received with rx_burst)
> metadata and can be accessed by RTE_FLOW_DYNF_METADATA() macro or
> with
> rte_flow_dynf_metadata_set() and rte_flow_dynf_metadata_get() helper
> routines. PKT_TX_DYNF_METADATA/PKT_RX_DYNF_METADATA flag will be set
> along with the data.
> 
> The mbuf dynamic field must be registered by calling
> rte_flow_dynf_metadata_register() prior accessing the data.
> 
> The availability of dynamic mbuf metadata field can be checked with
> rte_flow_dynf_metadata_avail() routine.
> 
> DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MATCH_METADATA offload and configuration flag is
> removed.
> The metadata support in PMDs is engaged on dynamic field registration.
> 
> Metadata feature is getting complex. We might have some set of actions
> and items that might be supported by PMDs in multiple combinations,
> the supported values and masks are the subjects to query by perfroming
> trials (with rte_flow_validate).
> 
> [1]
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpatches.dp
> dk.org%2Fpatch%2F62040%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Corika%40mellanox.com
> %7C59c1c0e65ad7436cb8f708d75e031341%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d14925
> 6f461b%7C0%7C0%7C637081239629362825&amp;sdata=A%2Fe1hjy02uGsgK5A
> ouK6pF%2BRdju5lcANP3ye3xx6qKs%3D&amp;reserved=0
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viachesl...@mellanox.com>
> ---
> 
> v7: - updates release notes
> v6: -
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpatches.dp
> dk.org%2Fpatch%2F62244%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Corika%40mellanox.com
> %7C59c1c0e65ad7436cb8f708d75e031341%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d14925
> 6f461b%7C0%7C0%7C637081239629362825&amp;sdata=72hW3BfXHQ0KGzNq
> o3M1TR%2BI4oQdJ5sU4wYzK74rF%2FA%3D&amp;reserved=0
> 
>  app/test-pmd/cmdline.c                 |  3 ++-
>  app/test-pmd/testpmd.c                 |  4 ----
>  app/test-pmd/testpmd.h                 |  2 +-
>  app/test-pmd/util.c                    | 15 +++++++++------
>  app/test/test_mbuf.c                   |  1 -
>  doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst     |  6 +++---
>  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_11.rst |  5 +++++
>  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c        | 19 ++++++-------------
>  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c           | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx_vec.h       |  6 ------
>  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txq.c            |  4 ----
>  lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c         |  1 -
>  lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h         |  5 -----
>  lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h           | 19 ++++++++++---------
>  lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c             |  2 --
>  lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h        | 19 +------------------
>  16 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
> 

Acked-by: Ori Kam <or...@mellanox.com>

Thanks,
Ori

Reply via email to