Hi Pavan,

thanks for the patch. Please, see my review notes below.

On 10/29/19 8:03 AM, pbhagavat...@marvell.com wrote:
From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavat...@marvell.com>

Some PMD can't work when certain offloads are disabled, to work around
this the PMD auto enable the offloads internally and expose it through
dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads.
After dev_configure is called compare the requested offloads to the
enabled offloads and log any offloads that have been enabled by the PMD.

Suggested-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybche...@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavat...@marvell.com>
---
  lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
index fef1dbb61..7dfc2f691 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
@@ -1142,6 +1142,8 @@ rte_eth_dev_configure(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t nb_rx_q, 
uint16_t nb_tx_q,
        struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
        struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info;
        struct rte_eth_conf orig_conf;
+       uint64_t offloads_force_ena;
+       uint64_t offload;
        int diag;
        int ret;
@@ -1357,6 +1359,26 @@ rte_eth_dev_configure(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
                goto rollback;
        }
+ /* Extract Rx offload bits that can't be disabled and log them */
+       offloads_force_ena = dev_conf->rxmode.offloads ^
+                       dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads;

Strictly speaking XOR returns diff and in theory the diff could
catch requested but not enabled offload in fact.
So, I think the variable name should be offloads_diff.
Yes, it is unexpected and very bad, but it adds even more
value to the check.
May be requested but not enabled offloads should be checked first:
((dev_conf->rxmode.offloads & ~dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads) != 0)
but I think it would be useful to log these offloads as well to help debugging,
so, it should be handled below.

+       while (__builtin_popcount(offloads_force_ena)) {

If we really need it, __builtin_popcountll() should be used, but I think we
don't need it here in fact since all we want to know if offloads_diff is 0 or not.
So, comparison to 0 will do the job without any builtins.

+               offload = 1ULL << __builtin_ctzll(offloads_force_ena);
+               offloads_force_ena &= ~offload;

Below we should differentiate if the offload is requested but not enabled (error)
and if the offload is not requested but enabled (info or warning as Ferruh
suggested).
I think ret should be set to some error if we find any requested, but not
enabled offload and finally configure should fail (after logging of all
violations) since it is a strong violation.

Same for Tx below.

Also I think that it is better to factor out these checks into a separate
function sinceĀ  rte_eth_dev_configure() is already too long.
It looks like that parameters should port ID, requested and
result offloads.

+               RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(INFO, "Port %u can't disable Rx offload %s\n",
+                              port_id, rte_eth_dev_rx_offload_name(offload));
+       }
+
+       /* Extract Tx offload bits that can't be disabled and log them */
+       offloads_force_ena = dev_conf->txmode.offloads ^
+                                   dev->data->dev_conf.txmode.offloads;
+       while (__builtin_popcount(offloads_force_ena)) {
+               offload = 1ULL << __builtin_ctzll(offloads_force_ena);
+               offloads_force_ena &= ~offload;
+               RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(INFO, "Port %u can't disable Tx offload %s\n",
+                              port_id, rte_eth_dev_tx_offload_name(offload));
+       }
+
        return 0;
rollback:

Reply via email to