On 10/24/2019 5:56 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 4:55 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/24/2019 3:53 PM, David Marchand wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 4:54 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 'rta_sec_era' global variable is defined in 'crypto/dpaa2_sec',
>>>> 'crypto/caam_jr' & 'crypto/dpaa_sec' PMDs with the same name. This means
>>>> they share same storage when application linked with static DPDK
>>>> library, which is not the intention. Three differing drivers sharing
>>>> same global variable is a defect.
>>>>
>>>> Variable has been used by multiple header files in static inline
>>>> functions and these header files are shared by all three PMDs, this
>>>> forces using same variable name in three PMDs.
>>>>
>>>> Since the variable is used only single .c file in 'crypto/dpaa2_sec' &
>>>> 'crypto/dpaa_sec' converting global variable to 'static', this requires
>>>> removing 'extern' definition from header files, and this requires moving
>>>> the global variable definition before including those headers in .c
>>>> files.
>>>>
>>>> For 'crypto/caam_jr' multiple .c files exists and includes these
>>>> headers which prevent making variable static, so only one file has the
>>>> global variable and others has 'extern' keyword on .c files.
>>>>
>>>> This change should let all three drivers have their own storage for the
>>>> 'rta_sec_era' global variable without multiple definitions.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 1d678de329ab ("crypto/caam_jr: add basic job ring routines")
>>>> Fixes: c3e85bdcc6e6 ("crypto/dpaa_sec: add crypto driver for NXP DPAA
>>>> platform")
>>>> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>>>
>>> Hit a build issue, with gcc, static build:
>>>
>>> ../drivers/crypto/dpaa_sec/dpaa_sec.c:33:25: error: static declaration
>>> of ‘rta_sec_era’ follows non-static declaration
>>> 33 | static enum rta_sec_era rta_sec_era;
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
>>> In file included from
>>> ../drivers/crypto/dpaa_sec/../dpaa2_sec/hw/rta/sec_run_time_asm.h:10,
>>> from ../drivers/crypto/dpaa_sec/dpaa_sec.c:32:
>>> ../drivers/crypto/dpaa_sec/../dpaa2_sec/hw/desc.h:21:25: note:
>>> previous declaration of ‘rta_sec_era’ was here
>>> 21 | extern enum rta_sec_era rta_sec_era;
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>> And
>>>
>>> ../drivers/crypto/dpaa2_sec/dpaa2_sec_dpseci.c:33:25: error: static
>>> declaration of ‘rta_sec_era’ follows non-static declaration
>>> 33 | static enum rta_sec_era rta_sec_era = RTA_SEC_ERA_8;
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
>>> In file included from
>>> ../drivers/crypto/dpaa2_sec/hw/rta/sec_run_time_asm.h:10,
>>> from ../drivers/crypto/dpaa2_sec/dpaa2_sec_dpseci.c:32:
>>> ../drivers/crypto/dpaa2_sec/hw/desc.h:21:25: note: previous
>>> declaration of ‘rta_sec_era’ was here
>>> 21 | extern enum rta_sec_era rta_sec_era;
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
>>> [5/86] Compiling C object
>>> 'drivers/a715181@@tmp_rte_pmd_caam_jr@sta/crypto_caam_jr_caam_jr.c.o'.
>>>
>>>
>> Would you be OK to defer the set to the next release?
>
> Either that or I only take the other 7 patches that are fine (dropped
> patch 4 and 9, as discussed some time ago).
>
If you are OK to pick the patches in the series, +1 from my end.
