On 24-Oct-19 8:37 AM, David Marchand wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 7:47 PM Burakov, Anatoly
<anatoly.bura...@intel.com> wrote:
On 23-Oct-19 11:42 AM, Li Han wrote:
In rte_eal_config_reattach(),the secondary mmap may fail
due to the rte_mem_cfg_addr already be used by others.do
the change just as the rte_fbarray_init() do.if no
base_virtaddr,use the default 0x100000000.
v2/v3:
-fix code style issues
Signed-off-by: Li Han <han....@zte.com.cn>
---
Nack. There's a reason why we map it at the same address, and it's to
have all pointers working across processes. Remapping it at a different
address has potential to break things.
Marked as rejected.
Thanks.
Hi David,
My apologies, I've misinterpreted the intent of the patch. I am
rescinding my NACK.
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
