From: Venkat Duvvuru <venkatkumar.duvv...@broadcom.com>

Currently, bnxt_uninit_locks is called inside bnxt_dev_uninit. However,
the more appropriate place to call it is inside bnxt_uninit_resources.
This is more logical, as all the resources uninitialization is happening
inside bnxt_uninit_resources.

Signed-off-by: Venkat Duvvuru <venkatkumar.duvv...@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Somnath Kotur <somnath.ko...@broadcom.com>
---
 drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
index e7ec99e..744f715 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
@@ -4772,6 +4772,7 @@ bnxt_uninit_resources(struct bnxt *bp, bool reconfig_dev)
                }
        }
 
+       bnxt_uninit_locks(bp);
        rte_free(bp->ptp_cfg);
        bp->ptp_cfg = NULL;
        return rc;
@@ -4813,8 +4814,6 @@ bnxt_dev_uninit(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
        eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst = NULL;
        eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst = NULL;
 
-       bnxt_uninit_locks(bp);
-
        return rc;
 }
 
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to