From: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com> We are currently writing the MAX supported MTU size even though the MTU passed by the application is a different value. Configure the application specified MTU instead.
Fixes: b7778e8a1c00 ("net/bnxt: refactor to properly allocate resources for PF/VF") Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com> Reviewed-by: Somnath Kotur <somnath.ko...@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Somnath Kotur <somnath.ko...@broadcom.com> --- drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c index ae26b30..c777c73 100644 --- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c +++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c @@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ int bnxt_hwrm_func_reserve_vf_resc(struct bnxt *bp, bool test) req.num_l2_ctxs = rte_cpu_to_le_16(BNXT_VF_RSV_NUM_L2_CTX); req.num_vnics = rte_cpu_to_le_16(BNXT_VF_RSV_NUM_VNIC); } else if (bp->vf_resv_strategy == - HWRM_FUNC_RESOURCE_QCAPS_OUTPUT_VF_RESV_STRATEGY_MAXIMAL) + HWRM_FUNC_RESOURCE_QCAPS_OUTPUT_VF_RESV_STRATEGY_MAXIMAL) { enables |= HWRM_FUNC_VF_CFG_INPUT_ENABLES_NUM_RSSCOS_CTXS; req.num_rsscos_ctxs = rte_cpu_to_le_16(bp->max_rsscos_ctx); } @@ -2956,7 +2956,8 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_pf_func_cfg(struct bnxt *bp, int tx_rings) } req.flags = rte_cpu_to_le_32(bp->pf.func_cfg_flags); - req.mtu = rte_cpu_to_le_16(BNXT_MAX_MTU); + req.mtu = rte_cpu_to_le_16(RTE_MIN(bp->eth_dev->data->mtu, + BNXT_MAX_MTU)); //FW adds hdr sizes req.mru = rte_cpu_to_le_16(BNXT_VNIC_MRU(bp->eth_dev->data->mtu)); req.num_rsscos_ctxs = rte_cpu_to_le_16(bp->max_rsscos_ctx); req.num_stat_ctxs = rte_cpu_to_le_16(bp->max_stat_ctx); -- 1.8.3.1