From: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com>

We are currently writing the MAX supported MTU size even though
the MTU passed by the application is a different value.
Configure the application specified MTU instead.

Fixes: b7778e8a1c00 ("net/bnxt: refactor to properly allocate resources for 
PF/VF")
Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Somnath Kotur <somnath.ko...@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Somnath Kotur <somnath.ko...@broadcom.com>
---
 drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c
index ae26b30..c777c73 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c
@@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ int bnxt_hwrm_func_reserve_vf_resc(struct bnxt *bp, bool 
test)
                req.num_l2_ctxs = rte_cpu_to_le_16(BNXT_VF_RSV_NUM_L2_CTX);
                req.num_vnics = rte_cpu_to_le_16(BNXT_VF_RSV_NUM_VNIC);
        } else if (bp->vf_resv_strategy ==
-                  HWRM_FUNC_RESOURCE_QCAPS_OUTPUT_VF_RESV_STRATEGY_MAXIMAL)
+                  HWRM_FUNC_RESOURCE_QCAPS_OUTPUT_VF_RESV_STRATEGY_MAXIMAL) {
                enables |= HWRM_FUNC_VF_CFG_INPUT_ENABLES_NUM_RSSCOS_CTXS;
                req.num_rsscos_ctxs = rte_cpu_to_le_16(bp->max_rsscos_ctx);
        }
@@ -2956,7 +2956,8 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_pf_func_cfg(struct bnxt *bp, int 
tx_rings)
        }
 
        req.flags = rte_cpu_to_le_32(bp->pf.func_cfg_flags);
-       req.mtu = rte_cpu_to_le_16(BNXT_MAX_MTU);
+       req.mtu = rte_cpu_to_le_16(RTE_MIN(bp->eth_dev->data->mtu,
+                                          BNXT_MAX_MTU)); //FW adds hdr sizes
        req.mru = rte_cpu_to_le_16(BNXT_VNIC_MRU(bp->eth_dev->data->mtu));
        req.num_rsscos_ctxs = rte_cpu_to_le_16(bp->max_rsscos_ctx);
        req.num_stat_ctxs = rte_cpu_to_le_16(bp->max_stat_ctx);
-- 
1.8.3.1

Reply via email to