> > I have applied your > > suggestion in 6/6 in v6 along with my corrections. The rte_ring_elem test > > cases are added in 3/6. I have verified that they are running > > fine (they are done for 64b alone, will add more). Hopefully, there are no > > more errors.
Applied v6 and re-run the tests. Functional test passes ok on my boxes. Pert-tests numbers below. As I can see pretty much same pattern as in v5 remains: MP/MC on 2 different cores and SP/SC single enq/deq show lower numbers for _elem_. For others _elem_ numbers are about the same or higher. Personally, I am ok to go ahead with these changes. Konstantin A - ring_perf_autotes B - ring_perf_elem_autotest ### Testing single element and burst enq/deq ### A B SP/SC single enq/dequeue: 8.27 10.94 MP/MC single enq/dequeue: 56.11 47.43 SP/SC burst enq/dequeue (size: 8): 4.20 3.50 MP/MC burst enq/dequeue (size: 8): 9.93 9.29 SP/SC burst enq/dequeue (size: 32): 2.93 1.94 MP/MC burst enq/dequeue (size: 32): 4.10 3.35 ### Testing empty dequeue ### SC empty dequeue: 2.00 3.00 MC empty dequeue: 3.00 2.00 ### Testing using a single lcore ### SP/SC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 8): 4.06 3.30 MP/MC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 8): 9.84 9.28 SP/SC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 32): 2.93 1.88 MP/MC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 32): 4.10 3.32 ### Testing using two hyperthreads ### SP/SC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 8): 9.22 8.83 MP/MC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 8): 15.73 15.86 SP/SC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 32): 5.78 3.83 MP/MC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 32): 6.33 4.53 ### Testing using two physical cores ### SP/SC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 8): 23.78 19.32 MP/MC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 8): 68.54 71.97 SP/SC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 32): 11.99 10.77 MP/MC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 32): 21.96 18.66 ### Testing using two NUMA nodes ### SP/SC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 8): 50.13 33.92 MP/MC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 8): 177.98 195.87 SP/SC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 32): 32.98 23.12 MP/MC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 32): 55.86 48.76
