> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 12:54 AM
> To: Joyce Kong (Arm Technology China) <joyce.k...@arm.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd <n...@arm.com>; tho...@monjalon.net;
> jer...@marvell.com; ravi1.ku...@amd.com; xuanziya...@huawei.com;
> cloud.wangxiao...@huawei.com; zhouguoy...@huawei.com;
> rm...@marvell.com; shsha...@marvell.com; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>; Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
> <gavin...@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/5] lib/eal: implement the family of rte
> bit operation APIs
> 
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 15:49:57 +0800
> Joyce Kong <joyce.k...@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> > +static inline void
> > +rte_set_bit(unsigned int nr, unsigned long *addr) {
> > +   __atomic_fetch_or(addr, (1UL << nr), __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL); }
> > +
> > +static inline void
> > +rte_clear_bit(int nr, unsigned long *addr) {
> > +   __atomic_fetch_and(addr, ~(1UL << nr), __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL); }
> > +
> > +static inline int
> > +rte_test_bit(int nr, unsigned long *addr) {
> > +   int res;
> > +   rte_mb();
> > +   res = ((*addr) & (1UL << nr)) != 0;
> > +   rte_mb();
> > +
> > +   return res;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int
> > +rte_test_and_set_bit(int nr, unsigned long *addr) {
> > +   unsigned long mask = (1UL << nr);
> > +
> > +   return __atomic_fetch_or(addr, mask, __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL) &
> mask; }
> > +
> > +static inline int
> > +rte_test_and_clear_bit(int nr, unsigned long *addr) {
> > +   unsigned long mask = (1UL << nr);
> > +
> > +   return __atomic_fetch_and(addr, ~mask, __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL) &
> mask; }
> 
> These functions need to be part of API, and have doxygen comments?

Will add doxygen comments in next version.

Reply via email to