Hi Ting,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xu, Ting
> Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2019 1:19 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo...@intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing
> <jingjing...@intel.com>; Iremonger, Bernard
> <bernard.iremon...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH v1] app/testpmd: fix CRC strip config error
>
> This patch fixed the bug that an error appears when config rx_offload
> crc_strip using command "port config all crc-strip on|off". The reason is that
> this command was removed previously. However, the current command
> does not enable "crc_strip" option properly, so that testpmd returns error
> when config crc_strip.
>
> In this patch, an additional operation is added to recognize "crc_strip"
> option, since "crc_strip" and "keep_crc" are using the same flag
> "DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_KEEP_CRC". The current command is "port config
> <port_id> rx_offload crc_strip on|off".
>
> Fixes: e5db17a1e54e ("app/testpmd: remove duplicated Rx offload
> commands")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Ting Xu <ting...@intel.com>
> ---
> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c index
> def471d97..31dbe4a07 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> @@ -18084,6 +18084,9 @@ search_rx_offload(const char *name)
> int found = 0;
> unsigned int bit;
>
> + if (!strcmp(name, "crc_strip"))
> + name = "keep_crc";
> +
> single_offload = 1;
> for (bit = 0; bit < sizeof(single_offload) * CHAR_BIT; bit++) {
> single_name =
> rte_eth_dev_rx_offload_name(single_offload);
> @@ -18113,6 +18116,7 @@ cmd_config_per_port_rx_offload_parsed(void
> *parsed_result,
> uint16_t nb_rx_queues;
> int q;
> int ret;
> + int res_on_off = 1;
>
> if (port->port_status != RTE_PORT_STOPPED) {
> printf("Error: Can't config offload when Port %d "
> @@ -18131,7 +18135,11 @@ cmd_config_per_port_rx_offload_parsed(void
> *parsed_result,
> return;
>
> nb_rx_queues = dev_info.nb_rx_queues;
> - if (!strcmp(res->on_off, "on")) {
> + res_on_off = strcmp(res->on_off, "on");
> +
> + if (!strcmp(res->offload, "crc_strip"))
> + res_on_off = ~res_on_off;
It looks as if res_on_off is intended to have a value of 0 or 1.
The above line gives it a value of -1, is this intended ?
> + if (!res_on_off) {
> port->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads |= single_offload;
> for (q = 0; q < nb_rx_queues; q++)
> port->rx_conf[q].offloads |= single_offload;
> --
> 2.17.1
Regards,
Bernard.
