> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coque...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 10:12 PM
> To: Liu, Yong <yong....@intel.com>; Bie, Tiwei <tiwei....@intel.com>; Wang,
> Zhihong <zhihong.w...@intel.com>; step...@networkplumber.org;
> gavin...@arm.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/14] vhost: check whether disable software pre-
> fetch
>
>
>
> On 10/9/19 3:38 PM, Marvin Liu wrote:
> > Disable software pre-fetch actions on Skylake and later platforms.
> > Hardware can fetch needed data for vhost, additional software pre-fetch
> > will impact performance.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu <yong....@intel.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/Makefile b/lib/librte_vhost/Makefile
> > index 30839a001..5f3b42e56 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_vhost/Makefile
> > +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/Makefile
> > @@ -16,6 +16,12 @@ CFLAGS += -I vhost_user
> > CFLAGS += -fno-strict-aliasing
> > LDLIBS += -lpthread
> >
> > +AVX512_SUPPORT=$(shell $(CC) -march=native -dM -E - </dev/null |grep
> AVX512F)
> > +
> > +ifneq ($(AVX512_SUPPORT),)
> > +CFLAGS += -DDISABLE_SWPREFETCH
> > +endif
>
> That's problematic I think, because the machine running the lib may be
> different from the machine building it, for example distros.
>
> In this case, a Skylake or later may be used to build the package, but
> with passing "-march=haswell". It would end-up prefetching being
> disabled whereas we would expect it to be enabled.
>
Thanks, Maxime. Got your idea. Compiling environment and running environment
maybe different.
Performance impact on skylake is around 1% in V1 patch under vhost/virtio
loopback scenario.
Since the impact is very small and has no impact in later revised version.
I'd like to remove this patch.
Regards,
Marvin
> I see several solutions:
> - Check for CONFIG_RTE_ENABLE_AVX512 flag.
> - Keep prefetch instructions (what would be the impact on Skylake and
> later?)
> - Remove prefetch instructions (what would be the impact on pre-
> Skylake?)
>
>
> But really, I think we need some figures before applying such a patch.
> What performance gain do you measure with this patch?
>
> > ifeq ($(RTE_TOOLCHAIN), gcc)
> > ifeq ($(shell test $(GCC_VERSION) -ge 83 && echo 1), 1)
> > CFLAGS += -DSUPPORT_GCC_UNROLL_PRAGMA
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/meson.build b/lib/librte_vhost/meson.build
> > index ddf0ee579..5c6f0c0b4 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_vhost/meson.build
> > +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/meson.build
> > @@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ elif (toolchain == 'clang' and
> cc.version().version_compare('>=3.7.0'))
> > elif (toolchain == 'icc' and cc.version().version_compare('>=16.0.0'))
> > cflags += '-DSUPPORT_ICC_UNROLL_PRAGMA'
> > endif
> > +r = run_command(toolchain, '-march=native', '-dM', '-E', '-',
> '</dev/null', '|', 'grep AVX512F')
> > +if (r.stdout().strip() != '')
> > + cflags += '-DDISABLE_SWPREFETCH'
> > +endif
> > dpdk_conf.set('RTE_LIBRTE_VHOST_POSTCOPY',
> > cc.has_header('linux/userfaultfd.h'))
> > version = 4
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> > index 56c2080fb..046e497c2 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -1075,7 +1075,9 @@ virtio_dev_rx_batch_packed(struct virtio_net *dev,
> struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> >
> > UNROLL_PRAGMA(UNROLL_PRAGMA_PARAM)
> > for (i = 0; i < PACKED_BATCH_SIZE; i++) {
> > +#ifndef DISABLE_SWPREFETCH
> > rte_prefetch0((void *)(uintptr_t)desc_addrs[i]);
> > +#endif
> > hdrs[i] = (struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *)
> > (uintptr_t)desc_addrs[i];
> > lens[i] = pkts[i]->pkt_len + dev->vhost_hlen;
> > @@ -1144,7 +1146,9 @@ virtio_dev_rx_packed(struct virtio_net *dev, struct
> vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> > uint32_t remained = count;
> >
> > do {
> > +#ifndef DISABLE_SWPREFETCH
> > rte_prefetch0(&vq->desc_packed[vq->last_avail_idx]);
> > +#endif
> >
> > if (remained >= PACKED_BATCH_SIZE) {
> > if (!virtio_dev_rx_batch_packed(dev, vq, pkts)) {
> > @@ -1790,7 +1794,9 @@ virtio_dev_tx_batch_packed(struct virtio_net *dev,
> struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> >
> > UNROLL_PRAGMA(UNROLL_PRAGMA_PARAM)
> > for (i = 0; i < PACKED_BATCH_SIZE; i++) {
> > +#ifndef DISABLE_SWPREFETCH
> > rte_prefetch0((void *)(uintptr_t)desc_addrs[i]);
> > +#endif
> > rte_memcpy(rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(pkts[i], void *, 0),
> > (void *)(uintptr_t)(desc_addrs[i] + buf_offset),
> > pkts[i]->pkt_len);
> > @@ -2046,7 +2052,9 @@ virtio_dev_tx_packed(struct virtio_net *dev, struct
> vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> > uint32_t remained = count;
> >
> > do {
> > +#ifndef DISABLE_SWPREFETCH
> > rte_prefetch0(&vq->desc_packed[vq->last_avail_idx]);
> > +#endif
> >
> > if (remained >= PACKED_BATCH_SIZE) {
> > if (!virtio_dev_tx_batch_packed(dev, vq, mbuf_pool,
> >
