A switch rule with "drop" action will be overwritten by a
rule with same pattern match but with a "to queue" action.
While in an inversed flow creation sequence, the "to queue"
can't be overwritten by the "drop" rule.
The inconsistent behavior is not expected, the patch
fix the issue by preventing rule overwrite in both cases.
Fixes: fed0c5ca5f19 ("net/ice/base: support programming a new switch recipe")
Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul M Stillwell Jr <paul.m.stillwell...@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c
b/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c
index c22235b68..6ca50e13d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c
@@ -5975,13 +5975,10 @@ ice_adv_add_update_vsi_list(struct ice_hw *hw,
u16 vsi_list_id = 0;
if (cur_fltr->sw_act.fltr_act == ICE_FWD_TO_Q ||
- cur_fltr->sw_act.fltr_act == ICE_FWD_TO_QGRP)
+ cur_fltr->sw_act.fltr_act == ICE_FWD_TO_QGRP ||
+ cur_fltr->sw_act.fltr_act == ICE_DROP_PACKET)
return ICE_ERR_NOT_IMPL;
- if (cur_fltr->sw_act.fltr_act == ICE_DROP_PACKET &&
- new_fltr->sw_act.fltr_act == ICE_DROP_PACKET)
- return ICE_ERR_ALREADY_EXISTS;
-
if ((new_fltr->sw_act.fltr_act == ICE_FWD_TO_Q ||
new_fltr->sw_act.fltr_act == ICE_FWD_TO_QGRP) &&
(cur_fltr->sw_act.fltr_act == ICE_FWD_TO_VSI ||
--
2.13.6
