> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China) [mailto:gavin...@arm.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 5:09 PM
> To: Liu, Yong <yong....@intel.com>; maxime.coque...@redhat.com; Bie, Tiwei
> <tiwei....@intel.com>; Wang, Zhihong <zhihong.w...@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/16] vhost: add single packet enqueue
> function
> 
> Hi Marvin,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Marvin Liu
> > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2019 12:36 AM
> > To: maxime.coque...@redhat.com; tiwei....@intel.com;
> > zhihong.w...@intel.com
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Marvin Liu <yong....@intel.com>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/16] vhost: add single packet enqueue
> > function
> >
> > Add vhost enqueue function for single packet and meanwhile left space
> > for flush used ring function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu <yong....@intel.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> > index 5b85b832d..2b5c47145 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -774,6 +774,70 @@ copy_mbuf_to_desc(struct virtio_net *dev, struct
> > vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> >       return error;
> >  }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Returns -1 on fail, 0 on success
> > + */
> > +static __rte_always_inline int
> > +vhost_enqueue_single_packed(struct virtio_net *dev, struct
> > vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> > +     struct rte_mbuf *pkt, struct buf_vector *buf_vec, uint16_t
> > *nr_descs)
> > +{
> > +     uint16_t nr_vec = 0;
> > +
> > +     uint16_t avail_idx;
> > +     uint16_t max_tries, tries = 0;
> > +
> > +     uint16_t buf_id = 0;
> > +     uint32_t len = 0;
> > +     uint16_t desc_count;
> > +
> > +     uint32_t size = pkt->pkt_len + dev->vhost_hlen;
> > +     avail_idx = vq->last_avail_idx;
> > +
> > +     if (rxvq_is_mergeable(dev))
> > +             max_tries = vq->size - 1;
> > +     else
> > +             max_tries = 1;
> > +
> > +     uint16_t num_buffers = 0;
> > +
> > +     while (size > 0) {
> > +             /*
> > +              * if we tried all available ring items, and still
> > +              * can't get enough buf, it means something abnormal
> > +              * happened.
> > +              */
> > +             if (unlikely(++tries > max_tries))
> > +                     return -1;
> > +
> > +             if (unlikely(fill_vec_buf_packed(dev, vq,
> > +                                             avail_idx, &desc_count,
> > +                                             buf_vec, &nr_vec,
> > +                                             &buf_id, &len,
> > +                                             VHOST_ACCESS_RW) < 0)) {
> > +                     return -1;
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             len = RTE_MIN(len, size);
> > +
> > +             size -= len;
> > +
> > +             avail_idx += desc_count;
> > +             if (avail_idx >= vq->size)
> > +                     avail_idx -= vq->size;
> > +
> > +             *nr_descs += desc_count;
> > +             num_buffers += 1;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (copy_mbuf_to_desc(dev, vq, pkt,
> > +                                     buf_vec, nr_vec,
> > +                                     num_buffers) < 0) {
> > +             return 0;
> Why return 0, which means success, while "copy_mbuf_to_desc" encounters
> some problems and failed?
> /Gavin

Gavin,
Thanks for notice this typo issue. Here should return negative value -1.

Regards,
Marvin

> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static __rte_noinline uint32_t
> >  virtio_dev_rx_split(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> >       struct rte_mbuf **pkts, uint32_t count)
> > @@ -831,6 +895,35 @@ virtio_dev_rx_split(struct virtio_net *dev, struct
> > vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> >       return pkt_idx;
> >  }
> >
> > +static __rte_unused int16_t
> > +virtio_dev_rx_single_packed(struct virtio_net *dev, struct
> vhost_virtqueue
> > *vq,
> > +     struct rte_mbuf *pkt)
> > +{
> > +     struct buf_vector buf_vec[BUF_VECTOR_MAX];
> > +     uint16_t nr_descs = 0;
> > +
> > +     rte_smp_rmb();
> > +     if (unlikely(vhost_enqueue_single_packed(dev, vq, pkt, buf_vec,
> > +                                              &nr_descs) < 0)) {
> > +             VHOST_LOG_DEBUG(VHOST_DATA,
> > +                             "(%d) failed to get enough desc from
> > vring\n",
> > +                             dev->vid);
> > +             return -1;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     VHOST_LOG_DEBUG(VHOST_DATA, "(%d) current index %d | end
> > index %d\n",
> > +                     dev->vid, vq->last_avail_idx,
> > +                     vq->last_avail_idx + nr_descs);
> > +
> > +     vq->last_avail_idx += nr_descs;
> > +     if (vq->last_avail_idx >= vq->size) {
> > +             vq->last_avail_idx -= vq->size;
> > +             vq->avail_wrap_counter ^= 1;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static __rte_noinline uint32_t
> >  virtio_dev_rx_packed(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> >       struct rte_mbuf **pkts, uint32_t count)
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> 
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the
> information in any medium. Thank you.

Reply via email to