On 9/15/2019 8:48 AM, Matan Azrad wrote: > Hi Ferruh > > From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> >> On 8/29/2019 8:47 AM, Matan Azrad wrote: >>> It may be needed by the user to limit the LRO session packet size. >>> In order to allow the above limitation, add new Rx configuration for >>> the maximum LRO session size. >>> >>> In addition, Add a new capability to expose the maximum LRO session >>> size supported by the port. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Matan Azrad <ma...@mellanox.com> >> >> Hi Matan, >> >> Is there any existing user of this new field? > > All the LRO users need it due to the next reasons: > > 1. If scatter is enabled - The dpdk user can limit the LRO session size > created by the HW by this field, if no field like that - there is no way to > limit it. > 2. No scatter - the dpdk user may want to limit the LRO packet size in order > to save enough tail-room in the mbuf for its own usage. > 3. The limitation of max_rx_pkt_len is not enough - doesn't make sense to > limit LRO traffic as single packet. >
So should there be more complement patches to this RFC? To update the users of the field with the new field.
