On 9/11/19 4:50 AM, Yu, Jin wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coque...@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Monday, September 9, 2019 6:21 PM
>> To: Yu, Jin <jin...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: Liu, Changpeng <changpeng....@intel.com>; Bie, Tiwei
>> <tiwei....@intel.com>; Wang, Zhihong <zhihong.w...@intel.com>; Lin Li
>> <lili...@baidu.com>; Xun Ni <ni...@baidu.com>; Yu Zhang
>> <zhangy...@baidu.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/10] vhost: checkout and cleanup the resubmit 
>> inflight
>> information
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/29/19 4:12 PM, JinYu wrote:
>>> This patch shows how to checkout the inflight ring and construct the
>>> resubmit information also include destroying resubmit info.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lin Li <lili...@baidu.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xun Ni <ni...@baidu.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <zhangy...@baidu.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jin Yu <jin...@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h  |  19 ++++
>>>  lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c      |  29 ++++-
>>>  lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h      |   9 ++
>>>  lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c | 197
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  4 files changed, 253 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>> ...
>>> +static int
>>> +vhost_check_queue_inflights_packed(struct virtio_net *dev,
>>> +                                            struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>>> +{
>>> +   uint16_t i = 0;
>>> +   uint16_t resubmit_num = 0, old_used_idx, num;
>>> +   struct rte_vhost_resubmit_info *resubmit = NULL;
>>> +   struct inflight_info_packed *inflight_packed;
>>> +
>>> +   if (!(dev->protocol_features &
>>> +           (1ULL << VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_INFLIGHT_SHMFD)))
>>> +           return RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_OK;
>>> +
>>> +   if (!vq->inflight_packed->version) {
>>> +           vq->inflight_packed->version = INFLIGHT_VERSION;
>>> +           return RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_OK;
>>> +   }
>>> +
>>> +   if ((!vq->inflight_packed))
>>> +           return RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR;
>>
>> It needs to be checked before before being dereferenced.
> Sorry I don't understand, you means I should check the vq pointer?

No, I meant vq->inflight_packed should be checked earlier, before
if (!vq->inflight_packed->version) {

>>> +
>>> +   inflight_packed = vq->inflight_packed;
>>> +   vq->resubmit_inflight = NULL;
>>> +   vq->global_counter = 0;
>>> +   old_used_idx = inflight_packed->old_used_idx;
>>> +
>>> +   if (inflight_packed->used_idx != old_used_idx) {
>>> +           if (inflight_packed->desc[old_used_idx].inflight == 0) {
>>> +                   inflight_packed->old_used_idx =
>>> +                           inflight_packed->used_idx;
>>> +                   inflight_packed->old_used_wrap_counter =
>>> +                           inflight_packed->used_wrap_counter;
>>> +                   inflight_packed->old_free_head =
>>> +                           inflight_packed->free_head;
>>> +           } else {
>>> +                   inflight_packed->used_idx =
>>> +                           inflight_packed->old_used_idx;
>>> +                   inflight_packed->used_wrap_counter =
>>> +                           inflight_packed->old_used_wrap_counter;
>>> +                   inflight_packed->free_head =
>>> +                           inflight_packed->old_free_head;
>>> +           }
>>> +   }
>>> +
>>> +   for (i = 0; i < inflight_packed->desc_num; i++) {
>>> +           if (inflight_packed->desc[i].inflight == 1)
>>> +                   resubmit_num++;
>>> +   }
>>> +
>>> +   if (resubmit_num) {
>>> +           resubmit = calloc(1, sizeof(struct rte_vhost_resubmit_info));
>>> +           if (resubmit == NULL) {
>>> +                   RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG,
>>> +                    "Failed to allocate memory for resubmit info.\n");
>>> +                   return RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR;
>>> +           }
>>> +
>>> +           resubmit->resubmit_list = calloc(resubmit_num,
>>> +                   sizeof(struct rte_vhost_resubmit_desc));
>>> +           if (resubmit->resubmit_list == NULL) {
>>> +                   RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG,
>>> +                    "Failed to allocate memory for resubmit desc.\n");
>>> +                   return RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR;
>>> +           }
>>> +
>>> +           num = 0;
>>> +           for (i = 0; i < inflight_packed->desc_num; i++) {
>>> +                   if (vq->inflight_packed->desc[i].inflight == 1) {
>>> +                           resubmit->resubmit_list[num].index = i;
>>> +                           resubmit->resubmit_list[num].counter =
>>> +                                   inflight_packed->desc[i].counter;
>>> +                           num++;
>>> +                   }
>>> +           }
>>> +           resubmit->resubmit_num = num;
>>> +
>>> +           if (resubmit->resubmit_num > 1)
>>> +                   qsort(resubmit->resubmit_list, resubmit-
>>> resubmit_num,
>>> +                           sizeof(struct rte_vhost_resubmit_desc),
>>> +                           resubmit_desc_compare);
>>> +
>>> +           vq->global_counter = resubmit->resubmit_list[0].counter + 1;
>>> +           vq->resubmit_inflight = resubmit;
>>> +   }
>>> +
>>> +   return RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_OK;
>>> +}
> 

Reply via email to