Hi, Xiao

This patch failed to apply on top of dpdk-next-net-intel/for-next-net, could
you help to do a rebase?

Thanks,
Xiaolong

On 09/02, Zhang Xiao wrote:
>The link status for 82599eb got from link status register was not correct,
>check the enable/disable flag of tx laser when getting the link status,
>set the link status down if tx laser disabled since the tx laser flag
>could be set correctly when up/down the link status.
>
>Fixes: dc66e5fd01b9 ("net/ixgbe: improve link state check on VF")
>Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
>Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiao <xiao.zh...@intel.com>
>---
> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c 
>b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>index 87d2ad0..fc06a1a 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>@@ -2864,6 +2864,7 @@ ixgbe_dev_set_link_up(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>       } else {
>               /* Turn on the laser */
>               ixgbe_enable_tx_laser(hw);
>+              ixgbe_dev_link_update(dev, 0);
>       }
> 
>       return 0;
>@@ -2894,6 +2895,7 @@ ixgbe_dev_set_link_down(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>       } else {
>               /* Turn off the laser */
>               ixgbe_disable_tx_laser(hw);
>+              ixgbe_dev_link_update(dev, 0);
>       }
> 
>       return 0;
>@@ -3967,6 +3969,7 @@ ixgbe_dev_link_update_share(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>       u32 speed = 0;
>       int wait = 1;
>       bool autoneg = false;
>+      u32 esdp_reg;
> 
>       memset(&link, 0, sizeof(link));
>       link.link_status = ETH_LINK_DOWN;
>@@ -3999,6 +4002,10 @@ ixgbe_dev_link_update_share(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>               return rte_eth_linkstatus_set(dev, &link);
>       }
> 
>+      esdp_reg = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_ESDP);
>+      if ((esdp_reg & IXGBE_ESDP_SDP3))
>+              link_up = 0;
>+
>       if (link_up == 0) {
>               intr->flags |= IXGBE_FLAG_NEED_LINK_CONFIG;
>               return rte_eth_linkstatus_set(dev, &link);
>-- 
>2.7.4
>

Reply via email to