This commit fixes an issue with the error checking in flow
MARK action. Previously, (ANY + MARK) would fail, as the
(mark_spec == 0) condition would cause an early error return,
however really it is (mark_spec != 0) that should cause the
early error return.

Flipping the binary comparison corrects the behaviour, and
(ANY + MARK) now succeeds, while (MARK + MARK) fails.

Fixes: 0bbcfc706a2b ("net/i40e: support MARK and RSS flow action")

Suggested-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haa...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mesut Ali Ergin <mesut.a.er...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
index c60c9e2..e902a35 100644
--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
@@ -3105,7 +3105,7 @@ i40e_flow_parse_fdir_action(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
        NEXT_ITEM_OF_ACTION(act, actions, index);
        switch (act->type) {
        case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_MARK:
-               if (!mark_spec) {
+               if (mark_spec) {
                        /* Double MARK actions requested */
                        rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
                           RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, act,
@@ -3117,7 +3117,7 @@ i40e_flow_parse_fdir_action(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
                filter->soft_id = mark_spec->id;
                break;
        case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_FLAG:
-               if (!mark_spec) {
+               if (mark_spec) {
                        /* MARK + FLAG not supported */
                        rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
                                           RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, act,
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to