On 7/16/2019 12:39 PM, Viacheslav Ovsiienko wrote:
> The DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MATCH_METADATA was introduced by [1], but
> it is not displayed by "show port [id] tx_offloads capabilities"
> command in testpmd.
> 
> [1] http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/47265/
> 
> Fixes: 839b20be0e9b ("ethdev: support metadata as flow rule criteria")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viachesl...@mellanox.com>
> ---
>  app/test-pmd/config.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c
> index ba43be5..8fb18be 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
> @@ -830,6 +830,14 @@
>                       printf("off\n");
>       }
>  
> +     if (dev_info.tx_offload_capa & DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MATCH_METADATA) {
> +             printf("TX match Flow metafata:        ");
> +             if (ports[port_id].dev_conf.txmode.offloads &
> +                 DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MATCH_METADATA)
> +                     printf("on\n");
> +             else
> +                     printf("off\n");
> +     }
>  }
>  
>  int
> 

Hi Viacheslav,

There is already another testpmd command that displays offloads, which is more
dynamic and I think better solution:
"show port <port_id> tx_offload capabilities"
"show port <port_id> tx_offload configuration"
"show port <port_id> rx_offload capabilities"
"show port <port_id> rx_offload configuration"

As far as I can see 'metadata' already supported by these commands, can you
please confirm?

And instead of improving it, what do you think dropping the duplicated command
"show port cap <port_id>|all" ?

Reply via email to