Sorry. Miss the first question. > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2019 18:32 > To: Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun...@intel.com> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing <jingjing...@intel.com>; Wiles, Keith > <keith.wi...@intel.com>; Liang, Cunming <cunming.li...@intel.com>; Maslekar, > Omkar <omkar.masle...@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce > <bruce.richard...@intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/5] raw/ntb: introduce ntb rawdev driver > > 02/07/2019 08:25, Xiaoyun Li: > > Introduce rawdev driver support for NTB (Non-transparent Bridge) which > > can help to connect two separate hosts with each other. > [...] > > +NTB Rawdev > > Is it Intel property? If yes, I suggest "Intel NTB" as title.
Not just Intel has NTB. AMD, PLX ... also have NTB. The rawdev should be compatible with many kinds of NTB. I implemented specific intel NTB in ntb_hw_intel.c/.h But there is no other ntb in DPDK now. So I am fine to name it as Intel NTB. > > > +M: Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun...@intel.com> > > +M: Jingjing Wu <jingjing...@intel.com> > > +F: drivers/raw/ntb_rawdev/ > > +F: doc/guides/rawdevs/ntb_rawdev.rst > > Sorry I missed to check the naming here. > Why is it called "ntb_rawdev" and not just "ntb" ? > If you are OK with "ntb" as directory name, I can rename it while applying. >
