-----Original Message-----
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2019 20:25
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 12/30] ip_frag: fix spelling error
Spelling errors found by codespell.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>
---
examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c | 2 +-
lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_reassembly.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c b/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c
index 85c0100f792d..eb6ca097aa7e 100644
--- a/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c
+++ b/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c
@@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ check_all_ports_link_status(uint32_t port_mask)
}
}
-/* Check L3 packet type detection capablity of the NIC port */
+/* Check L3 packet type detection capability of the NIC port */
static int
check_ptype(int portid)
{
diff --git a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_reassembly.c
b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_reassembly.c
index b7b92ed28549..28003e42af63 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_reassembly.c
+++ b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_reassembly.c
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ ipv4_frag_reassemble(struct ip_frag_pkt *fp)
/*
* Process new mbuf with fragment of IPV4 packet.
- * Incoming mbuf should have it's l2_len/l3_len fields setuped correclty.
+ * Incoming mbuf should have it's l2_len/l3_len fields setuped correctly.
[Artur] "Incoming mbuf should have its l2_len/l3_len fields set up correctly."
Isn't it better?
* @param tbl
* Table where to lookup/add the fragmented packet.
* @param mb
--
2.20.1
