2015-12-08 11:12, Yuanhan Liu: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 03:30:43AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2015-12-08 10:23, Yuanhan Liu: > > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 04:50:21PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > > When guest is booting (or any othertime guest is busy) it is possible > > > > for the small receive ring (256) to get full. If this happens the > > > > vhost library should just return normally. It's current behavior > > > > of logging just creates massive log spew/overflow which could even > > > > act as a DoS attack against host. > > > > > > > > Reported-by: Nathan Law <nlaw at brocade.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org> > > > > > > Acked-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com> > > > > Yuanhan, please what is your opinion about the balance benefit/risk > > of this patch for 2.2? > > Thomas, > > I agree with Stephen that such log is not necessary as it's a fair > normal case. However, I see no too much benefit/risk for 2.2: it > just removes a debug log after all.
Applied, thanks
