2015-12-08 09:50, Jianbo Liu: > On 8 December 2015 at 09:18, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com> > wrote: > > 2015-12-03 23:02, Jianbo Liu: > >> -ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM64),y) > >> +ifneq ($(filter y,$(CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM) $(CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM64)),) > > [...] > >> +#ifdef RTE_ARCH_ARM > >> +/* NEON intrinsic vqtbl1q_u8() is not supported in ARMv7-A(AArch32) */ > > > > I'm convinced there is a good reason why ARMv8 is also called ARCH_ARM64, > > and ARMv7 may be called AArch32 or ARCH_ARM. But I don't know why? > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/15/133 > > > Is ARCH_ARM32 or ARCH_ARMv7 too simple? > > Is it possible to have a 32-bit ARMv8? > Yes, ARMv8-R/M
So what does mean CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM? ARMv7? ARM32? Please consider a renaming.
