On 6/5/19 6:34 PM, Stillwell Jr, Paul M wrote:
if (!s_rule)
@@ -5576,8 +5606,8 @@ ice_add_adv_rule(struct ice_hw *hw, struct
ice_adv_lkup_elem *lkups,
s_rule->pdata.lkup_tx_rx.recipe_id = CPU_TO_LE16(rid);
s_rule->pdata.lkup_tx_rx.act = CPU_TO_LE32(act);
- ice_fill_adv_dummy_packet(lkups, lkups_cnt, rinfo->tun_type,
s_rule,
- pkt, pkt_len);
+ ice_fill_adv_dummy_packet(lkups, lkups_cnt, s_rule, pkt, pkt_len,
+ pkt_offsets);
Now that ice_fill_adv_dummy_packet() propagates an error, the caller
should do the same.
OK, can we accept this patch and have a separate patch that propagates the
error? It will take some time to get a patch that propagates the error done.
I'm OK with that, do you think it can be done for v19.08?
