04/06/2019 09:12, David Marchand: > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 11:48 PM Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> wrote: > > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst > > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst > > @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ Deprecation Notices > > > > + ``rte_eal_devargs_type_count`` > > > > +* ethdev: The function ``rte_eth_dev_count`` will be removed in DPDK > > 20.02. > > + It is replaced by the function ``rte_eth_dev_count_avail``. > > + If the intent is to iterate over ports, ``RTE_ETH_FOREACH_*`` macros > > + are better port iterators. > > + > > * vfio: removal of ``rte_vfio_dma_map`` and ``rte_vfio_dma_unmap`` APIs > > which > > have been replaced with ``rte_dev_dma_map`` and ``rte_dev_dma_unmap`` > > functions. The due date for the removal targets DPDK 20.02. > > Out of curiosity (ok, not entirely, since I need to write some notices). > Is there a rule for the order in which those entries are written?
Yes the order should be the same as for the features in the release notes. > I can see a notice about ethdev later in the file. Indeed, ethdev is supposed to be after EAL, it is my mistake. > Acked-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>
