Hi Ferruh, On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 06:11:35PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 4/10/2019 9:32 AM, Olivier Matz wrote: > > This RFC targets 19.08. > > > > The rte_net headers conflict with the libc headers, because > > some definitions are duplicated, sometimes with few differences. > > > > This RFC adds the rte_ (or RTE_) prefix to all structures, functions > > and defines in rte_net library. This is a big changeset, that will > > break the API of many functions, but not the ABI. > > > > This was discussed in [1], and recently requested by the techboard [2]. > > > > v2: > > * rebase on top of v19.05-rc1 > > > > [1] http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2018-January/087384.html > > [2] http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-February/125033.html > > > > Olivier Matz (14): > > net: add rte prefix to arp structures > > net: add rte prefix to arp defines > > net: add rte prefix to ether structures > > net: add rte prefix to ether functions > > net: add rte prefix to ether defines > > net: add rte prefix to esp structure > > net: add rte prefix to gre structure > > net: add rte prefix to icmp structure > > net: add rte prefix to icmp defines > > net: add rte prefix to ip structure > > net: add rte prefix to ip defines > > net: add rte prefix to sctp structure > > net: add rte prefix to tcp structure > > net: add rte prefix to udp structure > > Hi Oliver, > > This was planned as one of the early step for the 19.08. Should we continue > with > this patchset or are you planning to send a new version on top of latest head?
I've just send an updated version. Thanks, Olivier
