On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 03:11:10PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 26/04/2019 16:56, Bruce Richardson: > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 02:37:58PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > On Wed, 2019-04-24 at 13:31 +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:02:24PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2019-04-24 at 11:41 +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:22:04AM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 2019-04-23 at 23:06 +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > > > > > > +# > > > > > > > > rather > > > > > > > > than hacking our environment, just edit the .pc file prefix > > > > > > > > value > > > > > > > > +sed > > > > > > > > -i "s|prefix=|prefix=$DESTDIR|" $PKG_CONFIG_PATH/libdpdk.pc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What about just using meson's prefix option instead? Which is > > > > > > > how > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > would be used in a real use case > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think that would fully work, as my understanding is that > > > > > > the > > > > > > prefix > > > > > > option would apply only to the /usr/local parts, but not to the > > > > > > kernel > > > > > > modules which would still try and install in /lib/. > > > > > > > > > > What about doing a meson configure -Denable_kmods=false before the > > > > > ninja install? The modules are not needed for that test anyway, > > > > > right? > > > > > Alternatively, the kernel src dir could be symlinked in the build > > > > > path, > > > > > and the kernel_dir option could be used > > > > > > > > > > I'm just worried that the test should be as "realistic" as > > > > > possible, to > > > > > avoid missing something > > > > > > > > Yes, I did think of that too, but it does mean doing another > > > > configuration > > > > run in meson, and possibly a rebuild too if the rte_build_config.h > > > > file > > > > changes. Therefore I decided to use DESTDIR for the sake of speed > > > > here. I > > > > assumed there would be a pkg-config variable to adjust the output > > > > paths > > > > based on a sysroot, but couldn't find a suitable one. > [...] > > > > > > There actually is a pkg-config binary option, I just tried and it works > > > (it seems to be disabled by default on Debian and derivatives): -- > > > define-prefix > > > > > Any cmdline options to pkg-config don't solve the problem here as it means > > that the makefiles for any app need to be modified to use all those. > > It looks to be a good solution. > Being able to update the DPDK install directory when building > an application should be a mandatory requirement. > I suggest to wrap the call to pkg-config so we can have this ability. >
I would have expected that this issue has already been solved for packagers. I was surprised that I couldn't find an easy way to do so.
