[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix E-Switch flow without port item

[Ori Kam]

When creating a flow rule without the port_id pattern item, always the
PF was selected.

This commit fixes this issue, if no port_id pattern item is available
then we use the port that the flow was created on as source port.

Fixes: 822fb3195348 ("net/mlx5: add port id item to Direct Verbs")

Signed-off-by: Ori Kam <or...@mellanox.com>
---
 drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
index c2a2fc6..d17adbe 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
@@ -3623,6 +3623,8 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
        union flow_dv_attr flow_attr = { .attr = 0 };
        struct mlx5_flow_dv_tag_resource tag_resource;
        uint32_t modify_action_position = UINT32_MAX;
+       void *match_mask = matcher.mask.buf;
+       void *match_value = dev_flow->dv.value.buf;
 
        flow->group = attr->group;
        if (attr->transfer)
@@ -3895,23 +3897,8 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
        }
        dev_flow->dv.actions_n = actions_n;
        flow->actions = action_flags;
-       if (attr->ingress && !attr->transfer &&
-           (priv->representor || priv->master)) {
-               /* It was validated - we support unidirection flows only. */
-               assert(!attr->egress);
-               /*
-                * Add matching on source vport index only
-                * for ingress rules in E-Switch configurations.
-                */
-               flow_dv_translate_item_source_vport(matcher.mask.buf,
-                                                   dev_flow->dv.value.buf,
-                                                   priv->vport_id,
-                                                   0xffff);
-       }
        for (; items->type != RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_END; items++) {
                int tunnel = !!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_TUNNEL);
-               void *match_mask = matcher.mask.buf;
-               void *match_value = dev_flow->dv.value.buf;
 
                switch (items->type) {
                case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_PORT_ID:
@@ -4018,6 +4005,19 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
                }
                item_flags |= last_item;
        }
+       if (((attr->ingress && !attr->transfer) ||
+            (attr->transfer && !(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ITEM_PORT_ID))) &&
+           (priv->representor || priv->master)) {
+               /* It was validated - we support unidirection flows only. */
+               assert(!attr->egress);
+               /*
+                * Add matching on source vport index only
+                * for ingress rules in E-Switch configurations.
+                */
+               if (flow_dv_translate_item_port_id(dev, match_mask,
+                                                  match_value, NULL))
+                       return -rte_errno;
+       }
        assert(!flow_dv_check_valid_spec(matcher.mask.buf,
                                         dev_flow->dv.value.buf));
        dev_flow->layers = item_flags;
-- 
1.8.3.1