There are some variables declared in the middle of the function,
and one (i) is declared twice with two different types.
Tomasz and Tomasz, are you working on it urgently please?
19/04/2019 00:42, Yongseok Koh:
> Hi,
>
> I'm seeing compile error.
> Isn't it due to this patch?
>
> $ gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-28)
>
>
> FAILED: app/test/app@test@@dpdk-test@exe/test_compressdev.c.o
[...]
> ../app/test/test_compressdev.c: In function
> ‘test_compressdev_deflate_stateless_dynamic_big’:
> ../app/test/test_compressdev.c:1992:16: error: conflicting types for ‘i’
> for (uint32_t i = 0; i < BIG_DATA_TEST_SIZE - 1; ++i)
> ^
> ../app/test/test_compressdev.c:1949:11: note: previous definition of ‘i’ was
> here
> uint16_t i = 0;
> ^
> ../app/test/test_compressdev.c:1992:2: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations
> are only allowed in C99 mode
> for (uint32_t i = 0; i < BIG_DATA_TEST_SIZE - 1; ++i)
> ^
> ../app/test/test_compressdev.c:1992:2: note: use option -std=c99 or
> -std=gnu99 to compile your code
> ../app/test/test_compressdev.c:1996:19: warning: assignment from incompatible
> pointer type [enabled by default]
> int_data.buf_idx = &i;
> ^
> [1501/1523] Generating igb_uio with a custom command.
> make: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/3.10.0-862.el7.x86_64'
> CC [M]
> /auto/mtiswgwork/yskoh/git/mellanox/dpdk.org-2/build/kernel/linux/igb_uio/igb_uio.o
> Building modules, stage 2.
> MODPOST 1 modules
> make[1]: Warning: File
> `/auto/mtiswgwork/yskoh/git/mellanox/dpdk.org-2/build/kernel/linux/igb_uio/igb_uio.mod.c'
> has modification time 0.0096 s in the future
> CC
> /auto/mtiswgwork/yskoh/git/mellanox/dpdk.org-2/build/kernel/linux/igb_uio/igb_uio.mod.o
> LD [M]
> /auto/mtiswgwork/yskoh/git/mellanox/dpdk.org-2/build/kernel/linux/igb_uio/igb_uio.ko
> make[1]: warning: Clock skew detected. Your build may be incomplete.
> make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/3.10.0-862.el7.x86_64'
>
>
> Thanks,
> Yongseok
[...]
> >> +static int
> >> +test_compressdev_deflate_stateless_dynamic_big(void)
> >> +{
> >> + struct comp_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
> >> + uint16_t i = 0;
> >> + int ret = TEST_SUCCESS;
> >> + const struct rte_compressdev_capabilities *capab;
> >> + char *test_buffer = NULL;
> >> +
> >> + capab = rte_compressdev_capability_get(0,
> >> RTE_COMP_ALGO_DEFLATE);
> >> + TEST_ASSERT(capab != NULL, "Failed to retrieve device capabilities");
> >> +
> >> + if ((capab->comp_feature_flags &
> >> RTE_COMP_FF_HUFFMAN_DYNAMIC) == 0)
> >> + return -ENOTSUP;
> >> +
> >> + if ((capab->comp_feature_flags &
> >> RTE_COMP_FF_OOP_SGL_IN_SGL_OUT) == 0)
> >> + return -ENOTSUP;
> >> +
> >> + test_buffer = rte_malloc(NULL, BIG_DATA_TEST_SIZE, 0);
> >> + if (test_buffer == NULL) {
> >> + RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1,
> >> + "Can't allocate buffer for big-data\n");
> >> + return TEST_FAILED;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + struct interim_data_params int_data = {
> >> + (const char * const *)&test_buffer,
> >> + 1,
> >> + NULL,
> >> + &ts_params->def_comp_xform,
> >> + &ts_params->def_decomp_xform,
> >> + 1
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + struct test_data_params test_data = {
> >> + RTE_COMP_OP_STATELESS,
> >> + SGL_BOTH,
> >> + ZLIB_DECOMPRESS,
> >> + 0,
> >> + 1
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + ts_params->def_comp_xform->compress.deflate.huffman =
> >> +
> >> RTE_COMP_HUFFMAN_DYNAMIC;
> >> +
> >> + /* fill the buffer with data based on rand. data */
> >> + srand(BIG_DATA_TEST_SIZE);
> >> + for (uint32_t i = 0; i < BIG_DATA_TEST_SIZE - 1; ++i)
> >> + test_buffer[i] = (uint8_t)(rand() % ((uint8_t)-1)) | 1;
> >> +
> >> + test_buffer[BIG_DATA_TEST_SIZE-1] = 0;
> >> + int_data.buf_idx = &i;
