> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 6:10 PM
> To: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jer...@marvell.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 3/3] ci: enable tests on non-arm platforms
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jer...@marvell.com> writes:
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Aaron Conole
> >> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2019 10:53 PM
> >> To: dev@dpdk.org
> >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 3/3] ci: enable tests on non-arm platforms
> >>
> >> When building under Travis (or another linux CI service), enable
> >> running the tests for each build.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >> .ci/linux-build.sh | 7 +++++++
> >> .ci/linux-setup.sh | 6 +++++-
> >> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/.ci/linux-build.sh b/.ci/linux-build.sh index
> >> 4eb7c3cf0..72510a433
> >> 100755
> >> --- a/.ci/linux-build.sh
> >> +++ b/.ci/linux-build.sh
> >> @@ -22,3 +22,10 @@ fi
> >> OPTS="$OPTS --default-library=$DEF_LIB"
> >> meson build --werror -Dexamples=all $OPTS ninja -C build
> >> +
> >> +if [ "$AARCH64" != "1" ]; then
> >
> > If the indention is run only on X86 then, X86 == 1 would be the
> > correct logic as we do have powerpc and arm32 support in dpdk.
>
> Correct - I should have used a more robust and targeted test.
>
> > Any reason why we are opting out arm64?
> > There are some cloud hosting services with arm64 as well.
> >
> > https://www.packet.com/cloud/servers/c1-large-arm/
>
> There is At the moment, we aren't hooked up to any - do you know of one that
> we can easily integrate with right now? AFAICT, there are hosting services,
> but
I know, Following cloud hosting providers has arm64 support.
But, not sure about the feature set for CI work.
(2) and (3) are based on ThunderX servers.
https://www.linaro.cloud/
https://www.packet.com/cloud/servers/c1-large-arm/
www.scaleway.com
> we would still need all the other things that go with CI service (dashboards,
> scheduling, tracking, etc.) and it's a big project to set up, maintain, etc.
