On 02/12/15 13:11, Sergey Balabanov wrote: > Hello, > > I configured a bond port with 2 rx queues on it and added 2 slaves into the > bond port. When I run traffic I get all packets on queue #0. This is quite > expected when RSS turned off. When I turn on RSS all packets are distributed > between two rx queues. There is no guarantee that I will get all packets from > the slave port #0 on some queue and all packets from the slave port #1 on > another queue. > Does anybody know is there a way to configure bond port in a way when all > traffic > on port #0 goes to queue #0 and traffic on port #1 goes to queue #1? > > Thanks, > Sergey Balabanov >
Hey Sergey, this is the behavior I would expect. The way we've implemented it the same RSS configuration will get applied to each slave, so in the case of say a fail over event in active backup mode as rx traffic is moved onto a new master the traffic flows will be directed to the same queues as before. If I understand what you are asking for I'm not sure why you need a bonded port, why not just used the 2 ports with a single queue each rather than a single bonded port with 2 queues? Declan
