13/04/2019 08:24, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran: > > I was not confortable with this patch without being able to say why. > > Yesterday I spent more time to understand and see what may be improved. > > I agree it is late, so it won't block this patch for 19.05. > > Do you agree this file can be improved? > > Moving to the all to static config file is an option but we lose the > flexibility > of runtime detecting the options and few of them are probing at runtime based > on gcc versions and mcpu combination etc.
I think there is a misunderstanding. I'm suggesting to symplify arrays by indexing only by machine name. It should not change the behaviour. > I am not expert in meson area and not sure meson/python has better data > strcture for this other than > list/array combo. If Bruce has any feedback on this, then we > will try to prototype it. > > > Please would you like to look at reworking during next cycle? > > Thanks