> On Apr 10, 2019, at 12:41 PM, Yongseok Koh <ys...@mellanox.com> wrote: > > For client_server_mp, the total number of buffers for the mbuf mempool > should be correctly calculated. Otherwise, having more clients will stop > traffic. > > Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release") > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Yongseok Koh <ys...@mellanox.com> > --- > > v2: > * split up the calculation
Sorry, I forgot to specify 'v2' in the title of this email. Thanks, Yongseok > examples/multi_process/client_server_mp/mp_server/init.c | 13 +++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/examples/multi_process/client_server_mp/mp_server/init.c > b/examples/multi_process/client_server_mp/mp_server/init.c > index 30c8e44bc0..3af5dc6994 100644 > --- a/examples/multi_process/client_server_mp/mp_server/init.c > +++ b/examples/multi_process/client_server_mp/mp_server/init.c > @@ -37,8 +37,6 @@ > #include "args.h" > #include "init.h" > > -#define MBUFS_PER_CLIENT 1536 > -#define MBUFS_PER_PORT 1536 > #define MBUF_CACHE_SIZE 512 > > #define RTE_MP_RX_DESC_DEFAULT 1024 > @@ -63,8 +61,15 @@ struct port_info *ports; > static int > init_mbuf_pools(void) > { > - const unsigned num_mbufs = (num_clients * MBUFS_PER_CLIENT) \ > - + (ports->num_ports * MBUFS_PER_PORT); > + const unsigned int num_mbufs_server = > + RTE_MP_RX_DESC_DEFAULT * ports->num_ports; > + const unsigned int num_mbufs_client = > + num_clients * (CLIENT_QUEUE_RINGSIZE + > + RTE_MP_TX_DESC_DEFAULT * ports->num_ports); > + const unsigned int num_mbufs_mp_cache = > + (num_clients + 1) * MBUF_CACHE_SIZE; > + const unsigned int num_mbufs = > + num_mbufs_server + num_mbufs_client + num_mbufs_mp_cache; > > /* don't pass single-producer/single-consumer flags to mbuf create as it > * seems faster to use a cache instead */ > -- > 2.11.0 >